Be You.

Be happy.
Ask me anything

astronomically-androngynous:

sounddesignerjeans:

princess-mint:

alarajrogers:

niambi:

I’m????

Oh my God this actually explains so much.

So there’s a known thing in the study of human psychology/sociology/what-have-you where men are known to, on average, rely entirely on their female romantic partner for emotional support. Bonding with other men is done at a more superficial level involving fun group activities and conversations about general subjects but rarely involves actually leaning on other men or being really honest about emotional problems. Men use alcohol to be able to lower their inhibitions enough to expose themselves emotionally to other men, but if you can’t get emotional support unless you’re drunk, you have a problem.

So men need to have a woman in their lives to have anyone they can share their emotional needs and vulnerabilities with. However, since women are not socialized to fear sharing these things, women’s friendships with other women are heavily based on emotional support. If you can’t lean on her when you’re weak, she’s not your friend. To women, what friendship is is someone who listens to all your problems and keeps you company.

So this disconnect men are suffering from is that they think that only a person who is having sex with you will share their emotions and expect support. That’s what a romantic partner does. But women think that’s what a friend does. So women do it for their romantic partners and their friends and expect a male friend to do it for them the same as a female friend would. This fools the male friend into thinking there must be something romantic there when there is not.

This here is an example of patriarchy hurting everyone. Women have a much healthier approach to emotional support – they don’t die when widowed at nearly the rate that widowers die and they don’t suffer emotionally from divorce nearly as much even though they suffer much more financially, and this is because women don’t put all their emotional needs on one person. Women have a support network of other women. But men are trained to never share their emotions except with their wife or girlfriend, because that isn’t manly. So when she dies or leaves them, they have no one to turn to to help with the grief, causing higher rates of death, depression, alcoholism and general awfulness upon losing a romantic partner. 

So men suffer terribly from being trained in this way. But women suffer in that they can’t reach out to male friends for basic friendship. I am not sure any man can comprehend how heartbreaking it is to realize that a guy you thought was your friend was really just trying to get into your pants. Friendship is real. It’s emotional, it’s important to us. We lean on our friends. Knowing that your friend was secretly seething with resentment when you were opening up to him and sharing your problems because he felt like he shouldn’t have to do that kind of emotional work for anyone not having sex with him, and he felt used by you for that reason, is horrible. And the fact that men can’t share emotional needs with other men means that lots of men who can’t get a girlfriend end up turning into horrible misogynistic people who think the world owes them the love of a woman, like it’s a commodity… because no one will die without sex. Masturbation exists. But people will die or suffer deep emotional trauma from having no one they can lean on emotionally. And men who are suffering deep emotional trauma, and have been trained to channel their personal trauma into rage because they can’t share it, become mass shooters, or rapists, or simply horrible misogynists.

The only way to fix this is to teach boys it’s okay to love your friends. It’s okay to share your needs and your problems with your friends. It’s okay to lean on your friends, to hug your friends, to be weak with your friends. Only if this is okay for boys to do with their male friends can this problem be resolved… so men, this one’s on you. Women can’t fix this for you; you don’t listen to us about matters of what it means to be a man. Fix your own shit and teach your brothers and sons and friends that this is okay, or everyone suffers.

The next time a guy says, “What? You don't want to be my friend?” I’ll text him this and then ask if he really wants to be friends or just have another potential girlfriend.

y’all I am living for these analyses where the new way to fight the patriarchy is to teach men to love each other and themselves

Im a communication student and can confirm the above is absolutely 100% accurate and it’s called agentic vs communal friendship theorized by Steven McCornack

marvelsmostwanted:

marvelsmostwanted:

Nothing is more relatable than Antoni playing with the corgi while everyone else is distracted

Now he’s just carrying it around no Antoni you have to give it back

image

His screams when he realized there was a corgi were hilarious

iluminacje:

Stop this “work hard” bullshit. You deserve free time, you deserve sleep and you deserve mental health. You deserve to procrastinate and you deserve to have your hobbies. You deserve it. You need it. No one should work & study all the time.

manic:

nobody:

me when i eat pop rocks:

image

(Source: instagram.com)

kscotter:

2018: do u like me

2019: fuck u, i like me

circelline:

librius:

librius:

librius:

affdhbdfjojvtij im goNNA CRY

JELLYFISH IN SPANISH IS JUST “BAD WATER”

image
image

Listen, sometimes you’re swimming and you dont see the angry ocean ghost zap you, so you decide that its the water that hurts

fate:

comet (2014)

colorlessmidnight:

CAN SOMEONE JUST FUCKING LOVE ME?

onyourleftbooob:

solarpunk-aesthetic:

Just imagine a world full of beautiful stained glass windows which also generate electricity…

[Oxford Photovoltaics]

image

crisiskode:

shutyourmoustache:

Today’s letter is F.

And that’s a

FUCKING

EXCELLENT

IDEA!!!

I’ve had this on repeat for the last couple of minutes switching my hearing to hear either “that’s a fucking excellent idea” and “that sounds like an excellent idea” (which is what he’s actually saying) and it’s really tripping me out

theforestofthorns:

waitinghopingliving:

mkinnon:

i mean, there’s typecasting


and then there’s playing a version of cinderella’s stepsister four times

image

four

image

separate

image

productions

image
image

Here’s a bit of an explanation:

image

God I love her.

sensationallysavage:

lesbidrake:

psiotechniqa:

lesbidrake:

psiotechniqa:

theshitopinionsofsomeasswipeblm:

psiotechniqa:

gayasslena:

I’m losing my SHIT

This is some magical shit

The sad thing is, I don’t know who’s the bigger idiot.

I would argue its the Kara person - because she doesn’t it. Mike is pointing out the obvious

the obvious? what do you mean?

that she played ignorant, was treated accordingly, and that it was silly that she took offense over being deceptive about her understanding

could you explain further? I’m not sure I understand your meaning

I’ve never seen two murders in one post before.

More Information